Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Login with Facebook Sign In with Google Sign In with OpenID Sign In with Twitter

In this Discussion

Tagged

Readable version of my comments to James Corbett 911 interview
  • Sorry about that last post that came out goofy HTML script showing.

    The only point I regretted is that neither Corbett or Len made stated that 911 is the direct legacy of the JFK assassination.   I don't believe 911 could have happened without the Kennedy assassination which laid the groundwork for the shadow government to control uber-events.

    They even used much of the same playbook. examples include,

    1. Oswald just happened to drop his wallet at Tippit's car and they happened to find one of the alleged hijacker's passports.
       
    2. The post-event story was already created before the event even happened as they had it out to the media without hours of the event (e.g., Prouty reading New Zealand headlines and talking heads instantly saying it was Osama
       
    3. entire FBI counterterrorism team in LA on 9/11 and entire JFK cabinet in Hawaii bound for Japan on 11/22
       
    4. Secret Service called off JFK's motorcade and dog sniffing security stopped a week before 9/11
     
     5.  the entire crime scene carted off to dumpsters in China and the limousine and its windshield destroyed soon after the assassination, along with Secret Service washing the car at Parkland Hospital
      
     6. Both had commissions and compromised commissioners' consisting of foxes guarding the chicken coop.
      
     7.  Both commissions ignored critical evidence that would support an alternative view of intelligence interaction with "the lone gunman" and "the lone 19 hijackers."

    There are assuredly more examples. 

  • MinMMinM
    Posts: 439
    However more to your point .. OpenEyes ..

    question: Who benefited from 9/11 and the assassination of JFK?

    The
    false flag operation of 9/11 was not an “intelligence failure”. It was
    the greatest “intelligence success” and criminal operation in history. ~ Larry Chin


    9/11: Eternal Pretext, Eternal War

    answer: The MIC and the intelligence community as a whole.
  • MinM said:

    Corbett has a well sourced 9/11 piece at globalresearch.ca

     The September 11 Financial Heist: “Follow The 9/11 Money Trail”

    Having listened to more than one Corbett Report, I can't help thinking that Corbett is a stooge. His support of folks like Ron Paul pretty much tells the tale.




  • OpenEyes said:

    Sorry about that last post that came out goofy HTML script showing.

    The only point I regretted is that neither Corbett or Len stated that 911 is the direct legacy of the JFK assassination.   I don't believe 911 could have happened without the Kennedy assassination which laid the groundwork for the shadow government to control uber-events.

    More specifically, the WTC attacks could not have happened without the same mind set behind Operation Northwoods, shot down by Kennedy. The complaint that led to Northwoods came from our old friend, Ed Lansdale; at the time, head of Mongoose. Lansdale has been identified by Prouty and Krulak in a photograph from Dealey Plaza, so the common denominator here is Lansdale, not the Kennedy assassination per se.

    They even used much of the same playbook. examples include,

    1. Oswald just happened to drop his wallet at Tippit's car and they happened to find one of the alleged hijacker's passports.

    Indeed: Standard operating procedure. However, of more importance, the names of the supposed hijackers, some of whom are still alive, come from a list conveniently "left" by the hijackers in a rental car. To this day, the FBI insists on maintaining the fiction that the folks whose passports were lost or stolen were actually on the planes. Any true investigation would have taken this into account. Conclusion: The FBI was in on the coverup, if not the entire operation.
       
    2. The post-event story was already created before the event even happened as they had it out to the media within hours of the event (e.g., Prouty reading New Zealand headlines and talking heads instantly saying it was Osama

    More importantly, early on, there was an interview with a "man on the street" who turned out to be a Fox News stringer pinning the blame on bin Laden. The photographic manipulation, also, was way beyond anything attempted on 11 22, 1963. The same video from the same location was presented by multiple sources with altered backgrounds to sugegst that they were independent.
       
    3. entire FBI counterterrorism team in LA on 9/11 and entire JFK cabinet in Hawaii bound for Japan on 11/22

    These are similar, but not necessarily equivalent. The 11/22 cabinet event, in my estimation, was meant to keep anyone with any authority away from the events at the naval hospital and shortly thereafter. The FBI team's absence may have been intentional on the part of the FBI themselves, to protect the hijackers, the Saudi royal family, or even the folks with the launch codes used to blackmail Bush. As with 11/22, the FBI's role in 9/11 is murky at best. These folks seem to be quite good at muddying the waters when their culpability is at issue.
       
    4. Secret Service called off JFK's motorcade and dog sniffing security stopped a week before 9/11

    The Secret Service is certainly suspicious, but until we know what really brought down the towers, the lack of dogs at the towers isn't probative. There is overwhelming evidence that the collapse of the towers was not precipitated by normal explosive charges. Normal explosives do not turn steel and aluminum into dust so fine that researchers could find "thermite" in the dust. Keep in mind that thermite is simply extremely finely powdered aluminum and iron.
     
     5.  the entire crime scene carted off to dumpsters in China and the limousine and its windshield destroyed soon after the assassination, along with Secret Service washing the car at Parkland Hospital

    Again, the windshield manipulation is correct, but the "carted off to China" meme was just cover for the almost total lack of debris at the crime scene. There are photos from even before Building 7 collapsed showing a decided lack of the expected debris. Again, most of the towers drifted off as dust and never hit the ground. See various analyses of the seismic data showing the lack of anything resembling those buildings ever hitting the ground with full force.
      
     6. Both had commissions and compromised commissioners' consisting of foxes guarding the chicken coop.

    Absolutely correct, though the unpublished pages may be a ruse.
      
     7.  Both commissions ignored critical evidence that would support an alternative view of intelligence interaction with "the lone gunman" and "the lone 19 hijackers."

    Indeed: Both commissions were meant to, and only meant to, convince the ignorati that things had been looked into and the early conclusions of the FBI were correct. Nothing more, nothing less. In both cases, the commissions short circuited the normal investigative process. Both events were crimes that should have been prosecuted in the normal legal manner. And certainly, the Warren Commission set the precedent for this. 'Don't prosecute, just put a bunch of political idiots on a panel and tell them what their conclusions will be.' Sad.

    There are assuredly more examples. 

    Don't get too wrapped up in similarities. The second event showed a much more advanced set of abilities on the part of the perpetrators. And remember that Northwoods is the real progenitor of 9/11, not 11/22.